Last week, the Washington Post reported that the US was lowering its sights on what can be achieved in Iraq - to the extent that it
no longer expects to see a model new democracy, a self-supporting oil industry or a society in which the majority of people are free from serious security or economic challenges...
Today, we have an example of just how low that is, with the news that the US is supporting an Islamic republic rather than suffer the bad PR of seeing the new Iraqi constitution delayed by another week. Islam would be "a primary source" of law, and clerics would have authority over divorce and inheritance and possibly sit on the Supreme Court. This is what America's grand crusade for democracy has come down to: the establishment of a shitty theocracy which practices torture. And they killed 25,000 innocent civilians for this?
I cannot imagine a worse backfire in all of human history than the Iraq war.
ReplyDeleteI'm including all the times Russia got invaded in the Winter.
Now, everyone who would have voted for Bush on the grounds that he was the better war president, I have your servings of crow over here. Talking tough don't mean crap when you're only listening to the yes-men (and the yes-lady) when you ask what the situation is on the ground.
ReplyDeleteAnd boy, I only wish I'd gotten to take the number of holidays that bastard's taken over the past 5 years. Every now and then he's got to stand up and write a speech someone else wrote for him. And of course he occaisionaly has to pretend for the media that he takes part in the decision making processes behind the scenes. Boy, tough job!
Idiot/savant,
ReplyDeletewhat strtegy are you arguing for?
Should they renew their resolve not to permit an islamic state?
Genius - Bush persisted - against the clear exhortation of the left -in digging a huge and unstable hole. So now it's up to us to figure out what miracle of civil engineering can prevent it's collapse...? I don't think so..
ReplyDeleteGiven that the antiwar movement is doing absolutely nothing to help the cause of liberal values in Iraq ...
ReplyDeleteErrr, this is a surprise to anyone? The anti-war movement in America is predominantly anti-America and anti-liberalism.
Thx Sock, if we want the official US State dept position, we can get a copy of it from Scoop.
ReplyDeleteIf you'd hold your nose long enough to spend some time reading Juan Cole, you'd know the configuration bequeathed the Iraqi parliament by Bremner has been very effective in undermining the forming of a stable government and exacerbating factionalism.. it's not some accidental byproduct of a messy country.
Whether or not the intention was produce an Islamic state is an interesting question though.
Duncan - That's ridiculous. How can American citizens be "Anti-America"?!
ReplyDeleteThat's like saying I'm anti-myself.
They're Anti-America in the sens of being opposed to traditional American values. Most are anti-capitalist, anti-freedom, and anti-liberalism.
ReplyDeleteFWIW, all of the constitutional Islamist weirdness is going on in Iraq is a natural progression from their asinine Interim Constitution.
See my critique here:
A Libertarian Critique of the Interim Constitution for Iraq
Duncan, that's still ridiculous on two counts:
ReplyDelete1. Is a country/culture owned by the long dead or the presently living?
2. Many (most?) of the anti-war critiques of Bush et al are based on the undermining of freedom and democracy (eg Patriot acts, lying at the UN etc). If that's anti-liberal, someone has rewritten the dictionary while my back was turned.
Quick answer: by the living, and no - check out Protest Warrior to get an on-the-ground glimpse into the activities of 'anti-war' protestors in the U.S.A.
ReplyDeleteIf you're short of bandwidth or on dialup, let me know and I can mail you a CD I put together which contains some of their videos. It's interesting to watch protestors complaining about The Man silencing their views suddenly turn around and get the Police to evict counter-protestors :-)
Sock Thief - agreed, but do you really think the final Constitution will be any more secular than the Interim Constitution? I can only see it going downhill myself.
ReplyDelete> Bush persisted - against the clear exhortation of the left -in digging a huge and unstable hole.
ReplyDeleteThe "left" seems to be proposing as a solution compromise - if you get what you ask for and declare it to be terrible you are calling yourself terrible infact worse than your opposition who at least tried to resist you.
> That's ridiculous. How can American citizens be "Anti-America"?!
thats pretty stupid - lets say hitler was half jewish (maybe he was) does that prevent him from bein antisemetic? the terms loose meaning in your definition.
Bush may have hoped that he could make Iraq heaven on earth but if he did he was just living in a dream world - similarly those on the far left may think that they ahve some quick and easy solution but in most cases we are lucky they will never see the reigns of power.
I think you're missing the point Sock Thief. The tragedy in Iraq could have been avoided if there had been competent leadership in the White House. Their post-Saddam plan seemed to be "protect the oil ministry , protect the airport and pay our buddies to build us some nice new bases". The ignored the people who were insisting that it was going to turn into a quagmire.
ReplyDeleteBut of course, competent leaders wouldn't have invaded without a UN mandate and a half decent coalition behind them in any case. And they would have made sure they had a casus belli that wasn't such a complete fabrication.
Duncan, the Bush Administration is anti-freedom, anti-justice, and anti-truth. I'm just talking about what's going on in their own country, never mind what they're doing in Iraq. I think one could argue quite strongly that _they_ are the ones who are anti-American.