Currently, over 500 detainees are being held in the United State's "Carribean Gulag" at Guantanamo. They've been variously described as "dangeorus people", "the most dangerous, best-trained vicious killers on the face of the earth", and "the worst of a very bad lot... very dangerous...devoted to killing millions of Americans, innocent Americans, if they can". But according to a new study [PDF] based on declassified summaries of their "charges", less than half are accused of committing any hostile act against the USA or its allies. Given that "hostile acts" include owning a rifle (this is Afghanistan, remember), staying in a guest house (the equivalent of a motel), owning a digital watch, or wearing olive drab clothing, this is almost certainly massively overstating matters. This is borne out by the US government's own classification of the detainees: only 8% are alleged to be "fighters for" a terrorist organisation; the remainder are either "members of" or "associated with" one (barring the 2% for whom there are no alleged links with terrorist organisations whatsoever).
So, why are these people still there? Bluntly, because the US government does not give a shit about justice or evidence. Once they've got someone (and a large number of detainees were captured by bounty hunters in exchange for substantial sums of money), they are deemed a terrorist and imprisoned. And that imprisonment then becomes self-justifying - to the extent that it continues even when detainees are able to prove conclusively that they are not "enemy combatants". It is a Kafkaesque nightmare and a perfect perversion of everything America is supposed to stand for, made possible because Americans aren't interested in knowing and don't really care what is being done in their name.
2 comments:
The U.S. gets hit with one major terrorist attack and it abandons its democratic principles. The 3,000 dead from 9/11 are only roadkill compared to what the U.S. has lost as a result of the Bush administration's over-reaction. If we lose our system of government, does the enemy win?
Posted by Anonymous : 2/13/2006 06:33:00 PM
Yes.
Posted by Idiot/Savant : 2/13/2006 06:59:00 PM
Post a Comment
(Anonymous comments are enabled).