Tuesday, August 23, 2005



Debate

So, which party decided to stack the audiance with hooting chimpanzees?

9 comments:

I think both.

It wasn't distracting so much as frigging annoying.

Posted by Che Tibby : 8/23/2005 10:49:00 AM

According to a post this morning on Kiwiblog, the audience (composed of the respective party faithful) was encouraged by Ralston and Sainsbury to be noisy, and congratulated for doing so afterwards. Duh.

Cheers,
RB

Posted by Anonymous : 8/23/2005 11:44:00 AM

It was simply disgraceful. Whoever thumped their feet on the seats should have been thrown out.

Posted by Aaron Bhatnagar : 8/23/2005 01:11:00 PM

How unbecoming eh Aaron? Certainly not the way in which the good people of Epsom would/should behave. Off with their heads, eh wot?

Posted by Anonymous : 8/23/2005 01:27:00 PM

Did ayone notice that the thumping only came from the left?

Posted by Anonymous : 8/23/2005 02:07:00 PM

Anon - you think that political debates are enhanced by people thumping their feet on the studio seating?

Posted by Aaron Bhatnagar : 8/23/2005 04:59:00 PM

aaron, works on jerry springer.

Posted by che tibby : 8/23/2005 05:36:00 PM

Disgraceful - Banksie's favourite adjective : )

Posted by Anonymous : 8/23/2005 05:51:00 PM

who do Ralston and Sainsbury support?

Posted by Genius : 8/23/2005 06:29:00 PM